For Universities
One coordinated system for athlete financial operations.
Athletics, compliance, finance, legal, and business-office teams get a single institutional record for revenue-share operations, third-party NIL disclosure, contracts, tax readiness, and audit evidence — replacing spreadsheets, email approvals, and disconnected systems.
The Institutional Problem
Universities are now inside the payment flow, without a system built for it.
Institutional revenue sharing under the House v. NCAA settlement framework put universities directly in the flow of athlete-related payments for the first time. Most institutions are managing that responsibility with tools that were never built for it.
- Spreadsheets — standing in for a system of record
- Email — standing in for documented approvals
- Disconnected files — for contracts and compliance records
- Banking outside the workflow — with no link back to the institutional record
See the Coordinated System
Inside the university operating environment.
Explore working Stevera OS workflows for institutional oversight, compliance review, revenue-share operations, tax-document readiness, and audit evidence.
Product views are grounded in the Stevera OS working prototype and shown with fictional data.
University Portal — Athletic Department Overview
Stevera OS — University PortalUniversity Portal — Compliance Review Queue
Stevera OS — University PortalAdditional Institutional Workflows
Connected workflows across financial operations, tax-document readiness, and regulatory review.
Across revenue-share operations, compliance review, tax-document readiness, reporting, and institutional audit records.
Stevera OS — University Portal
Stevera OS — University Portal
Stevera OS — University PortalInstitutions retain responsibility for legal and compliance determinations.
Revenue-Share Planning and Administration
Plan, validate, approve, and document every distribution.
Officers create a distribution batch, choose an allocation method, and see cap utilization before anything is approved. Every approval is recorded against an auditable history — not a side conversation.
- 01UniversityDraftAn officer creates a distribution batch and selects an allocation method — equal split or manual, per athlete.
- 02SteveraValidateStevera OS checks the draft against the institutional cap and policy rules, and surfaces any advisory alerts.
- 03UniversityApproveAuthorized staff approve or reject the batch, with an auditable approval history.
- 04SteveraGenerate InstructionOnce approved, Stevera OS generates a structured payment instruction file for the banking partner.
- 05Banking PartnerExecuteThe banking partner executes the payments described in the instruction file.
- 06SteveraReconcile & ReportStevera OS reconciles execution against the record and updates cap-utilization reporting.
Modeled on Stevera OS's working revenue-share distribution workflow. Status labels and steps reflect the prototype's actual draft, approval, and reconciliation flow. Live, connected execution with a banking partner's systems is in collaborative development.
Third-Party NIL Disclosure and Review
A queue, not an inbox.
Disclosures come in, get scored against institutional risk rules, and route to the right reviewer. Status is always visible — needs attention, in review, or cleared — instead of buried in email threads.
- Structured disclosure intake and compliance review
- Rule-based risk and priority scoring for triage
- Internal routing and status tracking for every disclosure
- This is Stevera's internal workflow — distinct from live connectivity to an external clearinghouse, which is not yet integrated
Contract and Approval Workflows
Agreements tracked from draft to execution.
Draft, track, and execute agreements in the same record used for compliance and reporting, including in-app athlete signing and status tracking at every stage.
Year-End Tax Operations
In Collaborative DevelopmentFrom payment record to athlete delivery — without the year-end spreadsheet scramble.
Stevera organizes institution-recorded athlete payment activity, year-end totals, review status, and tax-document delivery in one coordinated workflow. University finance and tax teams retain responsibility for payer identity, classification, approval, and filing obligations. Once a finalized institution-approved document is issued, Stevera can make it available to the athlete through the connected application and preserve the related delivery and correction history.
Consolidated payment records
Bring institution-recorded revenue-share and other potentially reportable athlete payments into one structured year-end record.
Readiness and exception review
Surface missing information, unresolved classifications, returned payments, corrections, and approval gaps where supported by the current capability.
Institutional review and approval
Route applicable tax-document data and supporting records to authorized university finance or tax staff for review.
Athlete document delivery
Make finalized institution-approved documents available in the athlete application and notify the athlete when they are ready.
Delivery and correction history
Preserve issuance, delivery, correction, replacement, and acknowledgement status where supported.
Today, Stevera generates 1099-NEC documents from institution-recorded settled payments and makes them available for officer bulk review, export, and athlete viewing — a working-prototype capability. Broader year-end readiness review, institutional approval routing, document-ready notifications, and delivery/correction history are in collaborative development.
Roster, Agent, Sponsor, and Counterparty Records
A structured registry, not a folder of PDFs.
- Roster management — athlete name, sport, and account status, without exposing athlete financial data to staff who don't need it
- Agent-submitted deals and rep requests, with approval workflow
- A counterparty registry for sponsors, boosters, and facilitators, with transparent risk scoring
- Transfer-portal tracking with portability and compliance-risk snapshots
Reporting and Audit Evidence
Reporting drawn from the operating record — not a separate process.
Executive reporting, compliance analytics, and exportable audit evidence all come from the same underlying data used to run the workflow, so a report reflects what actually happened rather than a reconstruction after the fact.
Bank-Ready Payment Instructions and Reconciliation
The university decides. Stevera documents and instructs. The bank executes.
Once a distribution is approved, Stevera OS generates a structured payment instruction file for the banking partner. Execution and reconciliation are separate, clearly bounded steps — Stevera does not custody or transmit funds. Stevera does not perform payroll processing or employer tax withholding.
Stevera does not custody or transmit funds and does not control the university's or an athlete's bank accounts. Stevera is not presented as having access to athlete routing or account numbers. Stevera does not perform payroll processing or employer tax withholding, and the platform is not designed to convert universities into payroll processors. Banking-partner connectivity is in collaborative development.
Athlete Action Workflows
The athlete side of the same record.
Athletes see their own agreements, payment and third-party NIL activity, and tax documents — scoped to their own data only. This keeps the institutional workflow moving without additional manual follow-up.
Role and Data Boundaries
What university staff can — and cannot — see.
Compliance Officer / University Staff
Sees
- Compliance queue, disclosure review, and routing status
- Aggregate revenue-share cap utilization and treasury reporting
- Roster management — athlete name, sport, and account-active status only
- Contracts, tax-document generation, audit logs, staff management
Does Not See
- Athlete account balances or spendable amounts
- Athlete routing or account numbers or other banking details
- Athlete tax-reserve balances or transaction history
Explore a Founding Design Partnership
We are seeking a select group of institutional collaborators to help shape the operational standard for the next generation of college athletics. We would welcome the opportunity to meet with athletics, compliance, finance, legal, and university leadership teams to demonstrate the working prototype and understand institutional priorities.
